Vladimir Misijuk, Secertary General
Board of Administration Report
This is the third SYNDESMOS General Assembly held in
this country and the second one held at this place. Several young Orthodox Finns had
helped to establish the Fellowship, and the Orthodox Church in Finland with her youth
organisations hosted the SYNDESMOS General Secretariat for 13 years. Four Finns were in
charge of the Fellowship as its President and General Secretaries.
The XV General Assembly of SYNDESMOS held at Kykkou Monastery, Cyprus
in 1995, through revisions and amendments to the SYNDESMOS Constitution, initiated
substantial changes to the working structures and to the executive administration of the
Fellowship.
These changes were a reflection of developments and initiatives from
the early 1990s. They were also the necessary consequences of the rapid and remarkable
growth of the Fellowship during the previous triennium. In 1992, the SYNDESMOS XIV General
Assembly in Moscow accepted 26 and the last one in Cyprus another 44 new member
organisations and theological schools from 23 countries throughout the world. The sudden
growth of the number of members was accompanied by a dramatically increased number of
projects.
Fifteen organisations will be proposed to the General Assembly to be
accepted as new members. The Board has intentionally not encouraged an uncontrolled
increase in membership. Our term of office also saw an increased number of publications
and a widening of the circulation of SYNDESMOS News. The Fellowship's Newsletter is sent
free of charge to almost 4000 addresses. Another 1000 copies are distributed gratis
at SYNDESMOS events by the Regional Representatives and the staff.
All of these enterprises occurred under considerably difficult
circumstances. The newly elected Board of Administration had only two officers who had
been members of the previous Executive Committee and who could therefore provide the
secure continuity of work required by the SYNDESMOS Constitution. This same Board had to
deal with the unprecedented, substantial and crucially important structural changes in the
life of the Fellowship. The expanded number of SYNDESMOS events were co-ordinated from the
new location of the General Secretariat which at the end of 1995 was transferred from
Paris, France to Bialystok, Poland. Compared with the 28 major projects implemented in the
period 1992 -1995, 47 have been run during the passing quadrennium.
This quadrennium constituted a kind of a test run for the amendments in
the Constitution and for all of the structural changes. Some of them were, indeed,
improvements. They were necessary reactions to continuing changes and challenges. Still,
there is much to be done in the thorough and practical implementation of the structural
modifications stipulated by the Constitution.
WORKING STRUCTURES. Following the rapid increase in the number of SYNDESMOS members
and the decisions of the XV General Assembly, all of the Fellowship's member movements
were assigned to one of ten different SYNDESMOS Regions.
Because of the enormous difficulties in maintaining close contacts with
all of the members from the General Secretariat, the elected regional representatives were
expected to compensate by providing facilities for close interaction within their regions
as well as with other regions, the Board and the General Secretariat. It has not been easy
for all of the Board members to communicate with one another and with the General
Secretariat. Gradually this has been improving with the more frequent use of e-mail
facilities.
 |
Plenary session of the General Assembly |
The new constitutional and practical responsibilities and functions of
the representatives had never been "tested" by the time of the previous
Assembly; hence their extent was not fully understood by the delegates of the SYNDESMOS
members.
Inevitably, this led to certain complications in communication and
co-operation among the Board members, the General Secretariat and the Fellowship's
members. Of necessity the Board has used its constitutional rights and obligations to
replace its members who did not meet expectations.
Moreover, two Board members had become bishops and their new pastoral
responsibilities did not allow them to continue their work for SYNDESMOS. With respect to
the replacement of regional representatives, the regional member organisations followed
the newly-established procedure of nominating and electing their new representatives.
However, the Board replaces vice-presidents from among its own members.
The SYNDESMOS Executive Committee met twice each year, once
independently and once prior to the meetings of the whole Board. All of the Executive
Committee and Board of Administration meetings involved encounters with Patriarchs and
leading Orthodox hierarchs. The first Board meeting took place at the General Secretariat
in Bialystok, Poland, and the ceremony of the blessing of the Secretariat was led by
Archbishop Sawa, currently Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church in Poland. Subsequent Board
meetings took place in Beirut and Damascus, Constantinople and Moscow. The Board was
received by their Holinesses Ignatius IV of Antioch, the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew,
and Patriarch Alexis of Moscow and All Russia. Moreover, His All-Holiness, Ecumenical
Patriarch Bartholomew visited and blessed the new location of the General Secretariat
during his stay as guest of the Orthodox Church in Poland in 1998. The Board members and
the staff of the General Secretariat have also enjoyed close co-operation with the leading
hierarchs of local Orthodox Churches.
In the context of several replacements, with the lack of continuity
with the previous SYNDESMOS governing bodies, as well as the lack of detailed "job
descriptions" of the regional representatives and all the Board members, it has been
difficult for the Board to act as the guardian of SYNDESMOS's vision and spirit. To allow
for a more focused and efficient approach, the outgoing Board therefore suggests that the
new Board begins its term with a meeting dedicated to a thorough discussion and agreement
on the principal guidelines for their work. This is also the reason that the Calendar of
Events for this year contains the SYNDESMOS Board of Administration and Youth Worker
Training Course at the end of 1999.
The bringing together of the Board members and youth worker training is
not coincidental. Due to the increased number of projects and events, Board members have
been expected to facilitate, implement or even run the events scheduled in their regions.
In fact, some of the current Board members, in addition to their functions described in
the Constitution, took upon their shoulders the responsibility for the implementation of
several projects in other regions.
Under these challenging conditions SYNDESMOS has in many ways grown and
developed, although, there are areas where improvement is needed. We have, for instance,
increased in numbers, improved our financial base and broadened our sphere of activities.
At the same time, however, there has been a weakening in our infrastructure and
networking. This may, of course, reflect a crisis not only in the SYNDESMOS administration
but also in the life of the member movements themselves.
A memorial celebration of the 50th anniversary of a pan-Orthodox youth
meeting in Bossey, Switzerland, 1949, which was one of the critical initial steps in the
establishment of the World Fellowship of Orthodox Youth Organisations in 1953, was a
unique occasion for deeper reflection on the role, responsibility and place of SYNDESMOS
in the Church. Much has changed in the world and in the Fellowship since that time. Much
has also changed in recent years. All of this, and the forthcoming 50th anniversary of the
formal establishment of SYNDESMOS (which will coincide with the next SYNDESMOS General
Assembly in 2003), invite this Assembly to reflect deeply on the past, present and the
future of SYNDESMOS. Let us try to use this opportunity to prepare the Fellowship for its
golden anniversary as well as for the forthcoming millennium.
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. This crucially important matter needs to be studied
and discussed thoroughly at the regional meetings of the Assembly and appropriate
decisions should be reflected in the composition of the new Board. Throughout the past
quadrennium there were a number of positive examples of the development of regional
co-operation and wider exchange among the SYNDESMOS members and partner organisations.
The Finnish members continued their long-established tradition of
regular meetings of their regional and national SYNDESMOS committees. In 1996 the most
active SYNDESMOS members in Greece created a national structure designed for more
efficient exchange and co-operation. Through regular meetings of its committee and various
events organised in different parts of the country, this nationwide structure attempts to
co-ordinate youth work in the local Church.
A strong regional structure was also established in the Middle East.
After a very long break and difficulties in communication this region appears as one of
the most active. Orthodox youth of this region gather at annual regional encounters,
training seminars and have produced an Arabic version of SYNDESMOS News. In
addition, this region focused on one of the major and current concerns of SYNDESMOS,
which is the dialogue between the Orthodox and the Oriental Orthodox Churches.
In 1996, the Central European Region organised a meeting of the
representatives of its members. Although this was a very successful event, its important
decisions and plans for continuity were not implemented. In its place several regional
SYNDESMOS events were organised in this Region providing exceptional and sufficient
opportunities for meetings and exchanges.
The Eastern European Region also benefited from projects organised by
SYNDESMOS. Two projects of major importance were implemented in Lviv, Ukraine. Directly
after a youth worker training course organised mainly for representatives of the Ukrainian
Orthodox youth, a national structure was established and now a representative of the
Fellowship of Orthodox Youth in Ukraine is present at this Assembly.
To a great extent the VII International Consultation of Orthodox
Theological Schools has also served the regional structure. The theme of the Consultation,
"Theological Education and Youth Ministry," gathered over sixty representatives
of youth groups, organisations and other structures from different regions in Russia. The
hosts of this successful event, the Theological Schools of St. Petersburg, managed to use
this consultation to introduce and revive youth ministry at higher educational
institutions in the city.
It was not possible for the Western European Region to establish a
regional committee. The annual World Day of Orthodox Youth meetings and the four events
organised in the region have strengthened the regional network of youth organisations. New
movements have been established, others have been revived providing a solid base for
further developments. A particularly
significant event was the establishment of the pan-Orthodox youth movement in Germany with
the full support of all local canonical bishops.
Among most of the members of the Balkan Region there is continuous
communication not only through SYNDESMOS structures. Attempts have been made to establish
a regional committee, but owing to financial circumstances they have not transpired.
A follow-up on the contacts established earlier in South America
resulted in two study visits to Argentina and Chile. They, especially the second team
visit to Argentina, enabled SYNDESMOS to organise a successful youth exchange programme in
Chile in January 1999. The Latin American members have requested the creation of their own
regional structure in view of cultural and linguistic differences, and the lack of
activity in the North America Region.
Another example of positive developments initiated through SYNDESMOS
events have been in the Asian region. The project in Japan and that in Korea, together
with the one planned for this year in Indonesia, should lead to the creation of a more
permanent regional structure. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about all of the
SYNDESMOS Regions.
FEDERATED MEMBERS. The Federated member movements of SYNDESMOS are
scattered over various continents. This creates a problem for the representative to
interact with the members. Nevertheless, the federated organisations have expressed
gratitude to the Board for having sent its members to events in their regions. There have
been several joint ventures which have brought the youth of the two families closer
together. Furthermore, there has been an increase in the number of the Oriental Orthodox
youth at SYNDESMOS events in general. This happy circumstance has had positive results in
cultivating and strengthening ties.
The federated members also expressed their eagerness and prayer that
the two families - the Orthodox and the Oriental Orthodox - share the same cup of the Body
and Blood of Christ in the third millennium.
MEMBERS. In its efforts to maintain fruitful communication with SYNDESMOS
movements, members of the Board of Administration and the staff of the General Secretariat
paid visits to the organisations on numerous occasions. During the past quadrennium
SYNDESMOS established contacts with many Orthodox youth organisations. Fourteen of them
will be presented to the General Assembly for consideration as members of the Fellowship.
The applying members are from nine countries including Indonesia and Ethiopia, where
SYNDESMOS has no current representatives.
On the other hand, having experienced the operations of our existing
member movements, SYNDESMOS Board members identified groups that have not participated in
the life of the Fellowship for many years. Consequently, eight movements have been
classified as delinquent and their membership has been suspended by the Board after
several warnings were issued.
SYNDESMOS is a fellowship of movements, not a council of individuals.
Often the Board of Administration faces a mentality that identifies the Board with
SYNDESMOS and many expect everything to emanate from the Board. To a degree, this may be
the Board's own fault. The Board may have projected a false image of itself. However, it
was our hope to change this mentality, but we did not succeed. It is this administration's
opinion therefore, that the delegates of this Assembly return to their movements with
these sentiments and change theirmembers' perceptions about our Fellowship. In the future,
the Board should expect more from the SYNDESMOS members, and not vice versa.
GENERAL SECRETARIAT AND ADMINISTRATION. Following the XV General
Assembly, the SYNDESMOS General Secretariat was transferred from Paris to a new location
in Bialystok, Poland at the end of December 1995. The following period was one of
transition and of course there were some problems in infrastructure and communication,
especially since the Secretary General worked alone during that period. The reasonable
labour and administrative costs in Poland permitted in time the employment of necessary,
additional full-time staff. Moreover, an intern programme was initiated providing
assistance in the office work of the Secretariat. For the past two years there were three
full-time workers at the General Secretariat - the Secretary General, the Assistant
Secretary, and the Administrative Assistant - assisted by an intern and occasional
part-time support given by local volunteers.
The Secretary General was the only permanent staff member at the
Secretariat. I would like to use this opportunity to express my gratitude to all those who
assisted me at the Secretariat over these years. Thank you to Esther Hookway and Giles
Hutchinson of Great Britain; Joseph Matusiak and John DeTrana of the USA; Jarek Misiuk of
Poland; Caroline Robinson of Great Britain; Nina Loimi and Riina Jormanainen of Finland;
Anna Oikonomou of Great Britain; Sanna Tanskanen and Elena Gorschkow of Finland; and all
the volunteers from the Fellowship of Orthodox Youth in Poland.
This additional working force, however, was not always sufficient. The
considerable workload at the General Secretariat proved occasionally to be extremely heavy
and this inhibited its proper working. In the future an emphasis should be placed on the
co-ordination of the work of the Secretariat, both by the Board as employer and the
Secretary as employee. Developing good working structures between the Board and the
Secretariat should be among the chief priorities of the next administration. In order to
strengthen its logistical structures, SYNDESMOS also needs a clear long-term strategy.
In its location in Poland the General Secretariat maintained its status
as an international nongovernmental youth organisation. It continues to be supported by
international institutions such as the Council of Europe, the European Youth Foundation
and the European Commission.
PROGRAMME AND PROJECTS. SYNDESMOS programmes during 1995-1999 included
eleven youth leadership training courses with 485 participants; three summer institutes
with 230 participants; four festivals with 420 participants; nine youth exchanges,
encounters, and pilgrimages with 440 participants; and two theological schools
consultations with 230 participants. With regard to thematic events, SYNDESMOS sponsored
ten conservation and ecology projects with 172 participants; three programmes on Church
History, music and liturgical life with 65 participants; and one conference on Orthodoxy
and Europe for 25 participants.
Specialised conferences included one religious education programme for
25 participants; one Orthodox-Oriental Orthodox dialogue for 45 participants; one
conference on bioethical dilemmas with 60 participants; and one conference for 75 Orthodox
journalists.
This represents a total of 47 projects in which 2272 individuals
participated.
In the first two years of our term of office there was a rapid growth
in the number of projects. The year 1997 in particular saw a record number of 15 projects.
However, it was difficult to find participants for them. This was partly due to the
administration's inability to create strong ties with its member movements. It was also
due to the occasional late appearance of the Calendar and to the poor dissemination of our
advertising materials to the individual members by the SYNDESMOS member organisations.
This obliged the General Secretariat to embark upon an elusive hunt for
participants both within the SYNDESMOS membership and beyond _ a circumstance that had
both positive and negative consequences. Positive, because it cast a wider SYNDESMOS net
over Orthodox youth; and negative, because it restricted multiplier effects within the
movements themselves. In our enthusiasm to implement events we occasionally neglected to
project the long-term objectives of the Fellowship as outlined in the Constitution. On the
other hand the Board feels that its provision of service to the youth of the Church has
resulted in a unity that has grown over the years. This unity is perceptible both at the
administrative and at the member movement levels.
SYNDESMOS's events have been very decisive for regional networking, but
they were definitely insufficient to maintain permanent, or at least frequent and regular,
contacts and exchanges. With 130 member youth organisations and theological schools in 44
countries, it is impossible for the General Secretariat to establish and maintain close
working relationships with all of them. On the other hand, as the SYNDESMOS Board of
Administration and the General Secretariat have been intensely preoccupied with
fundraising and the preparation, organisation and implementation of a record number of
international projects, there was not enough time and attention dedicated to the members
themselves. Some of the Board members made a notable difference in this respect, but
unfortunately this rather confirms the general rule of this term.
Through its events SYNDESMOS has been able to function as a facilitator
for groups of Orthodox specialists and professionals, enabling them to gather, to discuss
and to continue on their own. The consultations of theological schools could lead to the
establishment of an association. The SYNDESMOS Conference of Journalists has paved the way
for the creation of the journalists' association. There are significant other examples at
the local and regional levels.
This year an enormous amount of concentration has been laid on the
preparations for the General Assembly. Nevertheless, four successful projects were
implemented in Chile, Russia, Switzerland and Greece.
PUBLICATIONS. SYNDESMOS News now appears in English, Russian
and Arabic. A Romanian version is in press.
SYNDESMOS has produced a large number of valuable resource books both
alone and in collaboration with other organisations. In conjunction with the World Day of
Orthodox Youth a collection of essays on Orthodox youth ministry - Orthodox Youth
Ministry in the Orthodox Church - was published in 1997.
Promotional materials have also been produced, including SYNDESMOS
Calendars and programmes of events, brochures, posters, and t-shirts.
SYNDESMOS Publications
1995-1999
The following titles have been published.
Orthodoxy & Ecology Resource Book
Orthodox Youth Camp Manual
Orthodox Youth and Ecumenism Resource Book
Prayer Book
The following were published in co-operation with the World Council
of Churches.
The Orthodox Churches in the World Council of Churches: Towards the
Future
The Ecumenical Movement, the Churches, and the World Council of
Churches
Proclaiming Christ Today
Editorial work continues on the following titles.
War and Nationalism: Sources and Resources
Orthodoxy and Ecology Resource Book in Russian
Directory of Orthodox Theological Schools
Bioethical Dilemmas and Orthodoxy
Halki, Belgrade and St. Petersburg Theological School Consultations
Reports
Photocopied resource books have been produced and distributed for
specific events on the following themes.
Orthodox Youth Camp Workbook in French
Orthodoxy and Europe resource file in French and English
Resource File Bossey 1949-1999
|
FINANCES. The cash revenues of
the previous SYNDESMOS administration for the period 1 July 1992 - 30 June 1995 amounted
to US$560,000. The cash revenues of the present administration for the period 1 July 1995
through 31 December 1998 amounted to US$814,000. Proportionally speaking this constitutes
an increase of 25%.
The accounting of our large and growing financial operations has
remained the responsibility of the Secretary General. This task has now become burdensome
as a result of SYNDESMOS's growth. Indeed, it almost amounts to a full-time occupation and
must executed by someone at the Secretariat.
SOURCES OF INCOME. Inevitably, the increased number of projects required
intensive fund rasing efforts by the Board. Through his academic and professional
connections in Great Britain, the President succeeded in opening up new sources of income.
Moreover, because SYNDESMOS operated a presidential office in Oxford, the Fellowship was
able to secure valuable funding from the European Commission.
Other important revenue sources come from ecumenical sources such as
the World Council of Churches, the Conference of European Churches, and the Council of
Europe. Aside from these European governmental and ecumenical organisations, significant
sources of funding have also come from several environmental charities.
Savings have also been realised as a result of the significantly lower
costs of administration in Poland.
FUNDING FROM ORTHODOX SOURCES . The financial contribution from the
Orthodox Churches has, comparatively speaking, been minimal. The Orthodox Church in
Finland is the only one that has been providing an annual grant to the Fellowship. The
Ecumenical Patriarchate also supports us materially. However, funding from Orthodox
sources was essential in implementing numerous SYNDESMOS events. In-kind contributions,
reductions as well as direct payments for various services related to the projects were
also helpful. We gratefully acknowledge the generosity and support of the local Orthodox
Churches, dioceses, parishes, Church organisations, hierarchs and individuals. On behalf
of the Board of Administration I would like to express gratitude to all the SYNDESMOS
members and their representatives who participated actively in the life of the Fellowship.
We owe thanks to all the funding agencies, organisations, individuals and all those who
have helped to implement projects and carry out the Fellowship's activities.
CONCLUDING REMARKS. Allow me to continue with thanks for the trust and
the blessings that I have received in working for SYNDESMOS over the last four years. I
would like to thank all those who provided their invaluable help and assistance making the
work of the Secretary General and the General Secretariat a team work. There are many of
those I would like to thank in particular: the President, the Board members who assisted
in writing applications and other tasks of the Secretariat, administrative assistants and
interns, especially Jarek Misiuk, Joseph Matusiak and Nina Liomi, the Assistant Secretary
who made me feel that the Finns are indispensable. Finally, there is one person I would
like to single out as having made possible everything that has been achieved through my
efforts. She patiently tolerated my long working hours and absences and supported and
sustained me providing a solid foundation for all my work. Thank you, Tania.
These four years have produced so many blessings and yet also
difficulties and frustrations. Sometimes it became clear to me that SYNDESMOS's Board
members and its constituency often had quite different understandings of the very nature
of its life and work.
At the Orthodox Theological Seminary in Jableczna, where I taught
Patristics, I recall a discussion concerning the liturgical language of traditionally
Orthodox Eastern European countries and in Poland. The vast majority defended Church
Slavonic as the best and the only possible medium, arguing that it is comprehensible to
all the Slavic Orthodox nations and there is no necessity to translate it into the modern
Slavic languages. As the minority objected, we decided to study the case more carefully.
The seminarians were asked to translate one phrase from the Hexapsalmon - one five-word
phrase which they heard daily and almost took for granted. They were given five minutes to
translate five words - "serdce moe smjatesja vo mne" - "my heart has smjatesja
within me." There were no problems with "my heart" and "within
me." These are common to all the Slavic languages. The smjatesja, however,
turned out to be a problem. The majority proposed a simplified translation, "my heart
has moved within me." However, there were also attempts to be more specific
concerning the movement. In one of the interpretations the heart has thrilled in
fear, another one made it shake in horror. This difference would not be a big
problem if it did not appear in the context of two other interpretations according to
which the heart has rejoiced and even jumped in joy. Just one word and such
a potential for vastly different interpretations.
Telling this story I have been thinking about another phrase which we
are expected to comprehend. A very similar case - five words, four comprehensible ones
describing the ancient and biblical word. Very often we hear it, very often we see it and
use it extensively in our correspondence - SYNDESMOS, the World Fellowship of Orthodox
Youth.
|